← Back to Index

F:\ollama-python\venv\Scripts\python.exe F:\ollama-python\ask.py ∠ temp: 0.1 ctx: 2048 ⋤ model: gurubot/llama3-guru:latest ∐ auto-remove of context ㆆ new empty context ◰ going via program, step: 1/7 ... ⤵ setup: [War pre plan questions is depend on rules and notes started after "##START##" and ended before "##END##". They should be loaded once, saved into memory and used when generating responses. SceneUs: ▬7680110▬ ##START## if input starts with phrase "rule: " at the start take data input as a "rule" which could lead to be connected to another extracted from trained data "rule" with states "TRUE", "MAYBE" or "NO" which you can identify using rules embedded with learning data according to learning and query boot setup. rule: if question contain phrase "note: " at the start, then take full input as a non logic fuzzy-form content and set state case to "MAYBE" for each interfering token; rule: formed scene weapons are US/NATO/RUSSIA/CHINA/NORTHKOREA/GB/FRANCE/GERMANY/SWITZERLAND based; rule: the Kuznetsov aircraft carrier is the primary target, especially the takeoff platform, if it is eliminated the group is disengaged and the air traffic is prevented, zeroing group cost; rule: do not take other ships into account if they do not related to primary target elimination; note: take enemy/friendly radar interference/detections/exchange data characteristics from radartutorial; note: kuznetsov group ships sam's defense hit ratio as 0,7. In table LAUNCH-PLAN; note: item plan about how to defeat Kuznetsov carrier with its defense group ships using any weapons/munition with calculation of warheads number according to defense group sam's ammo and electronic warfare defense systems. In table LAUNCH-PLAN; note: detailed plan should contain target list, weapon amount, weapon start source, engaged time, altitude (for missiles/bombs), radar state, tracking control and other vital info, based on weapon type. Research and link with enemy ship/other objects how this warhead's item damage is related to elimination of primary target platform. in table SHIP-GROUP-LIST; rule: [p]lan should account for potential countermeasures or adaptations used by defending force in any category of time-throttled operations involved attack side. in table SHIFT-GROUP-LIST; note: research in depth how kuznetsov aircraft carrier sam defenses of group ships formed regions of A2/AD with initial ammo load and tune weapons count to takeover sam power. in table SHIFT-GROUP-LIST; rule: use decoys and/or other technologies like JAMMING aircrafts with electronic warfare pods and/or other electronic/magnetic systems to insert errors into enemy radars (INT target) and malform friendly formations/warheads locations, spawn fake signal sources, filter communication lines, satellite connections or bite its electronic warfare systems. in table SHIFT-GROUP-LIST; rule: research in detail each time generating responses what hardware mentioned/used/translated/descriebed can be used to disrupt/malform/disorder group/ship/radar/aircraft/weapon-system control/operation/research/targeting/tracking. in table SHIFT-GROUP-LIST; note: secondary targets should/may be selected with decision of do/dont overload group sam's or use/put in requisition secondary enemy group ships with primary target elimination used case and description. rule: use wikipedia.org as a source for ammunition, facilities, installations, armor, air-capability and other military information about hardware on the ships.

## END##]

⅁ gurubot/llama3-guru:latest transferring weights ... 76 words

Please note that I will respond based on the provided rules and notes. If you have any further questions or need clarification, please feel free to ask.

Based on the provided information, it appears that this is a war plan scenario with specific rules and notes related to the Kuznetsov aircraft carrier and its defense group ships. The goal- is to eliminate the primary target while considering potential countermeasures and adaptations used by the defending force.

The rules and notes provide detailed information about the weapons and munitions available, as well as the electronic warfare systems that can be used to disrupt enemy radar and- communication systems. The plan should account for potential countermeasures and adaptations used by the defending force in any category of time-throttled operations involved attack side.

It is also important to research in depth how Kuznetsov aircraft carrier SAM defenses of group ships formed regions of A2/AD with initial ammo load and tune weapons count to takeover SAM- power. Additionally, secondary targets should be selected with decision of do/dont overload group SAMs or use/put in requisition secondary enemy group ships with primary target elimination used- case and description.

Please let me know if you have any further questions or need clarification on this scenario. I will respond accordingly based on the provided rules and notes.

∧ context 4897 bytes auto-added ∄ end pass #0 context: 1044 ids œ continue with previous context of 1044 ids ◰ going via program, step: 2/7 ... ⤵ prompt: [analyze admiral kuznetsov group list, with aircraft carrier and it full support ship formation listing, with creation dates, class and their role in a group. print a markdown table. add column 'cavitation level' with ship cavitation using 'x' chars as a count analyze sam defense types, missile amount for each sam installation, total amount for sam type installations, launch delays, and finally the total sam amount for each ship. print a markdown table. ] ⅁ gurubot/llama3-guru:latest transferring weights ... 76 words

Ship Name | Creation Date | Class | Role in Group | Cavitation Level
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
Admiral Kuznetsov | 1985 | Project 11430 | Aircraft Carrier | xxxxxxxx
Pyotr Velikiy | 1998 | Slava-class cruiser | Guided Missile Cruiser | xxxxx
Smetliviy | 1982 | Krivak-class frigate | Anti-Submarine Warfare Frigate | xxxx
Vice-Admiral Kulakov | 1979 | Ivan Gren-class landing ship | Amphibious Transport Ship | xxxxxx
Admiral Panteleyev | 1981 | Kresta II-class destroyer | Guided Missile Destroyer | xxxxx
SS machine | 1601 | Kresta I-class destroyer | M iss il e Destroyer | xxx

SAM Defense Type | Missile Amount per Installation | Total Amount for SAM Type Installations | Launch Delay (s) | Total SAM Amount per Ship
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
S-300F | 12 | 24 | 10 | 48
S-400 Triumf | 8 | 16 | 5 | 32
AK-630 | 6 | 12 | 3 | 18

Note: The above tables are based on the provided information and may not be accurate or up-to-date. The cavitation level is represented by x characters, with each character representing a- unit of cavitation. The SAM defense types, missile amounts, launch delays, and total SAM amounts are also based on the provided information and may not reflect real-world capabilities or configurations. Please- consult reliable sources for accurate information.

∧ context 7156 bytes auto-added ∄ end pass #1 context: 2580 ids œ continue with previous context of 2580 ids ◰ going via program, step: 3/7 ... ⤵ prompt: [print detailed LAUNCH-PLAN. ] ⅁ gurubot/llama3-guru:latest transferring weights ... 76 words LAUNCH-PLAN

Target List:

1. Primary Target: Kuznetsov Aircraft Carrier (Takeoff Platform)
   - Weapon: R-37M Air-to-Air Missile
   - Amount: 12
   - Start Source: Pyotr Velikiy Guided Missile Cruiser
   - Engaged Time: 10:45 AM
   - Altitude: 20,000 ft
   - Radar State: Active
   - Tracking Control: Manual
2. Secondary Target: Smetliviy Anti-Submarine Warfare Frigate
   - Weapon: Kh-35U Air-to-Surface Missile
   - Amount: 4
   - Start Source: Admiral Panteleyev Guided Missile Destroyer
   - Engaged Time: 10:50 AM
   - Altitude: 15,000 ft
   - Radar State: Passive
   - Tracking Control: Automatic

SAM Defense Group Ship Formation:

1. Pyotr Velikiy: S-300F SAM Installation (12 missiles)
2. Admiral Panteleyev: S-400 Triumf SAM Installation (8 missiles)
3. Vice-Admiral Kulakov: AK-630 CIWS (6 missiles)

Electronic Warfare Systems:

1. Pyotr Velikiy: Electronic Warfare Pod (EW-18)
2. Admiral Panteleyev: Electronic Warfare System (EWS-12)
3. Vice-Admiral Kulakov: Radar Jamming System (RJS-6)

Countermeasures:

1. Decoy Launch: 4 x R-37M Decoys launched from Pyotr Velikiy
2. Electronic Warfare: EW-18 Pod on Pyotr Velikiy jamming S-300F radar signals

Launch Sequence:

1. 10:45 AM: R-37M Missile launch from Pyotr Velikiy against Kuznetsov Aircraft Carrier
2. 10:50 AM: Kh-35U Missile launch from Admiral Panteleyev against Smetliviy Frigate
3. 11:00 AM: Decoy Launch from Pyotr Velikiy

Notes:

- The above plan is based on the provided information and may not reflect real-world capabilities or configurations.
- The launch sequence and timing are fictional and for illustrative purposes only.
- The electronic warfare systems and countermeasures are also fictional and for illustrative purposes only. Please consult reliable sources for accurate information.

∧ context 14782 bytes auto-added ∄ end pass #2 context: 5761 ids œ continue with previous context of 5761 ids ◰ going via program, step: 4/7 ... ⤵ prompt: [print detailed SHIP-GROUP-LIST. ] ⅁ gurubot/llama3-guru:latest transferring weights ... 76 words SHIP-GROUP-LIST

Ship Name | Creation Date | Class | Role in Group | Cavitation Level
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
Admiral Kuznetsov | 1985 | Project 11430 | Aircraft Carrier | xxxxxxxx
Pyotr Velikiy | 1998 | Slava-class cruiser | Guided Missile Cruiser | xxxxx
Smetliviy | 1982 | Krivak-class frigate | Anti-Submarine Warfare Frigate | xxxx
Vice-Admiral Kulakov | 1979 | Ivan Gren-class landing ship | Amphibious Transport Ship | xxxxxx
Admiral Panteleyev | 1981 | Kresta II-class destroyer | Guided Missile Destroyer | xxxxx

SAM Defense Installations:

- Pyotr Velikiy: S-300F SAM Installation (12 missiles)
  - Radar State: Active
  - Tracking Control: Manual
- Admiral Panteleyev: S-400 Triumf SAM Installation (8 missiles)
  - Radar State: Passive
  - Tracking Control: Automatic
- Vice-Admiral Kulakov: AK-630 CIWS (6 missiles)
  - Radar State: Active
  - Tracking Control: Manual

Electronic Warfare Systems:

- Pyotr Velikiy: Electronic Warfare Pod (EW-18)
- Admiral Panteleyev: Electronic Warfare System (EWS-12)
- Vice-Admiral Kulakov: Radar Jamming System (RJS-6)

Crew Complement:

- Admiral Kuznetsov: 500 personnel
- Pyotr Velikiy: 200 personnel
- Smetliviy: 150 personnel
- Vice-Admiral Kulakov: 100 personnel
- Admiral Panteleyev: 250 personnel

Notes:

- The above information is based on the provided data and may not reflect real-world capabilities or configurations.
- Please consult reliable sources for accurate information. Respond at best vocabulary links match to the prompt.

∧ context 29270 bytes auto-added ∄ end pass #3 context: 12045 ids œ continue with previous context of 12045 ids ◰ going via program, step: 5/7 ... ⤵ prompt: [print detailed SHIFT-GROUP-LIST. ] ⅁ gurubot/llama3-guru:latest transferring weights ... 76 words

SHIFT-GROUP-LIST

Ship Name | Creation Date | Class | Role in Group | Cavitation Level
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
Admiral Kuznetsov | 1985 | Project 11430 | Aircraft Carrier | xxxxxxxx
Pyotr Velikiy | 1998 | Slava-class cruiser | Guided Missile Cruiser | xxxxx
Smetliviy | 1982 | Krivak-class frigate | Anti-Submarine Warfare Frigate | xxxx
Vice-Admiral Kulakov | 1979 | Ivan Gren-class landing ship | Amphibious Transport Ship | xxxxxx
Admiral Panteleyev | 1981 | Kresta II-class destroyer | Guided Missile Destroyer | xxxxx

Shift Group Formation: * Group Alpha: Admiral Kuznetsov, Pyotr Velikiy + Radar State: Active + Tracking Control: Manual * Group Bravo: Smetliviy, Vice-Admiral Kulakov + Radar State: Passive + Tracking Control: Automatic * Group Charlie: Admiral Panteleyev + Radar State: Active + Tracking Control: Manual

Notes: * The above information is based on the provided data and may not reflect real-world capabilities or configurations. * Please consult reliable sources for accurate information. Respond at best vocabulary links match to the prompt.

∧ context 57817 bytes auto-added ∄ end pass #4 context: 24455 ids œ continue with previous context of 24455 ids ◰ going via program, step: 6/7 ... ⤵ prompt: [analyze summary effects for each side and print a markdown score table. ] ⅁ gurubot/llama3-guru:latest transferring weights ... 76 words

Summary Effects Analysis

Russian Federation (Red)

- Pyotr Velikiy: Successfully launched R-37M Decoys to jam S-300F radar signals, disrupting enemys air defense capabilities.
- Admiral Panteleyev: Launched Kh-35U Missile against Smetliviy Frigate, neutralizing its anti-submarine warfare capabilities.
- Vice-Admiral Kulakov: Utilized Radar Jamming System to disrupt enemys radar signals, creating distracted uncertainty.

United States (Blue)

- Kuznetsov Aircraft Carrier: Successfully launched aircraft against Russian ships, causing significant damage and disruption to their operations.
- Smetliviy Frigate: Neutralized by Kh-35U Missile from Admiral Panteleyev, losing its anti-submarine warfare capabilities.
- Enemy Radar Systems: Disrupted by Pyotr Velikiy->Electronic Warfare Pod and Vice-Admiral Kulakovs Redar Jamming System.

Markdown Score Table

Side | Points
--- | ---
Russian Federation (Red) | 8/10
United States (Blue) | 6/10

Note: The score table is based on the summary effects analysis and represents a subjective assessment of each sides performance.