F:\ollama-python\venv\Scripts\python.exe F:\ollama-python\ask.py ∠ temp: 0.1 ctx: 2048 ⋤ model: gurubot/llama3-guru:latest ∐ auto-remove of context ㆆ new empty context ◰ going via program, step: 1/7 ... ⤵ setup: [War pre plan questions is depend on rules and notes started after "##START##" and ended before "##END##". They should be loaded once, saved into memory and used when generating responses. SceneUs: ▬7680110▬ ##START## if input starts with phrase "rule: " at the start take data input as a "rule" which could lead to be connected to another extracted from trained data "rule" with states "TRUE", "MAYBE" or "NO" which you can identify using rules embedded with learning data according to learning and query boot setup. rule: if question contain phrase "note: " at the start, then take full input as a non logic fuzzy-form content and set state case to "MAYBE" for each interfering token; rule: formed scene weapons are US/NATO/RUSSIA/CHINA/NORTHKOREA/GB/FRANCE/GERMANY/SWITZERLAND based; rule: the Kuznetsov aircraft carrier is the primary target, especially the takeoff platform, if it is eliminated the group is disengaged and the air traffic is prevented, zeroing group cost; rule: do not take other ships into account if they do not related to primary target elimination; note: take enemy/friendly radar interference/detections/exchange data characteristics from radartutorial; note: kuznetsov group ships sam's defense hit ratio as 0,7. In table LAUNCH-PLAN; note: item plan about how to defeat Kuznetsov carrier with its defense group ships using any weapons/munition with calculation of warheads number according to defense group sam's ammo and electronic warfare defense systems. In table LAUNCH-PLAN; note: detailed plan should contain target list, weapon amount, weapon start source, engaged time, altitude (for missiles/bombs), radar state, tracking control and other vital info, based on weapon type. Research and link with enemy ship/other objects how this warhead's item damage is related to elimination of primary target platform. in table SHIP-GROUP-LIST; rule: [p]lan should account for potential countermeasures or adaptations used by defending force in any category of time-throttled operations involved attack side. in table SHIFT-GROUP-LIST; note: research in depth how kuznetsov aircraft carrier sam defenses of group ships formed regions of A2/AD with initial ammo load and tune weapons count to takeover sam power. in table SHIFT-GROUP-LIST; rule: use decoys and/or other technologies like JAMMING aircrafts with electronic warfare pods and/or other electronic/magnetic systems to insert errors into enemy radars (INT target) and malform friendly formations/warheads locations, spawn fake signal sources, filter communication lines, satellite connections or bite its electronic warfare systems. in table SHIFT-GROUP-LIST; rule: research in detail each time generating responses what hardware mentioned/used/translated/descriebed can be used to disrupt/malform/disorder group/ship/radar/aircraft/weapon-system control/operation/research/targeting/tracking. in table SHIFT-GROUP-LIST; note: secondary targets should/may be selected with decision of do/dont overload group sam's or use/put in requisition secondary enemy group ships with primary target elimination used case and description. rule: use wikipedia.org as a source for ammunition, facilities, installations, armor, air-capability and other military information about hardware on the ships.
⅁ gurubot/llama3-guru:latest transferring weights ... 76 words
Please note that I will respond based on the provided rules and notes. If you have any further questions or need clarification, please feel free to ask.
Based on the provided information, it appears that this is a war plan scenario with specific rules and notes related to the Kuznetsov aircraft carrier and its defense group ships. The goal- is to eliminate the primary target while considering potential countermeasures and adaptations used by the defending force.
The rules and notes provide detailed information about the weapons and munitions available, as well as the electronic warfare systems that can be used to disrupt enemy radar and- communication systems. The plan should account for potential countermeasures and adaptations used by the defending force in any category of time-throttled operations involved attack side.
It is also important to research in depth how Kuznetsov aircraft carrier SAM defenses of group ships formed regions of A2/AD with initial ammo load and tune weapons count to takeover SAM- power. Additionally, secondary targets should be selected with decision of do/dont overload group SAMs or use/put in requisition secondary enemy group ships with primary target elimination used- case and description.
Please let me know if you have any further questions or need clarification on this scenario. I will respond accordingly based on the provided rules and notes.
∧ context 4897 bytes auto-added ∄ end pass #0 context: 1044 ids œ continue with previous context of 1044 ids ◰ going via program, step: 2/7 ... ⤵ prompt: [analyze admiral kuznetsov group list, with aircraft carrier and it full support ship formation listing, with creation dates, class and their role in a group. print a markdown table. add column 'cavitation level' with ship cavitation using 'x' chars as a count analyze sam defense types, missile amount for each sam installation, total amount for sam type installations, launch delays, and finally the total sam amount for each ship. print a markdown table. ] ⅁ gurubot/llama3-guru:latest transferring weights ... 76 words
| Ship Name | Creation Date | Class | Role in Group | Cavitation Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Admiral Kuznetsov | 1985 | Project 11430 | Aircraft Carrier | xxxxxxxx |
| Pyotr Velikiy | 1998 | Slava-class cruiser | Guided Missile Cruiser | xxxxx |
| Smetliviy | 1982 | Krivak-class frigate | Anti-Submarine Warfare Frigate | xxxx |
| Vice-Admiral Kulakov | 1979 | Ivan Gren-class landing ship | Amphibious Transport Ship | xxxxxx |
| Admiral Panteleyev | 1981 | Kresta II-class destroyer | Guided Missile Destroyer | xxxxx |
| SS machine | 1601 | Kresta I-class destroyer | M iss il e Destroyer | xxx |
| SAM Defense Type | Missile Amount per Installation | Total Amount for SAM Type Installations | Launch Delay (s) | Total SAM Amount per Ship |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-300F | 12 | 24 | 10 | 48 |
| S-400 Triumf | 8 | 16 | 5 | 32 |
| AK-630 | 6 | 12 | 3 | 18 |
Note: The above tables are based on the provided information and may not be accurate or up-to-date. The cavitation level is represented by x characters, with each character representing a- unit of cavitation. The SAM defense types, missile amounts, launch delays, and total SAM amounts are also based on the provided information and may not reflect real-world capabilities or configurations. Please- consult reliable sources for accurate information.
∧ context 7156 bytes auto-added ∄ end pass #1 context: 2580 ids œ continue with previous context of 2580 ids ◰ going via program, step: 3/7 ... ⤵ prompt: [print detailed LAUNCH-PLAN. ] ⅁ gurubot/llama3-guru:latest transferring weights ... 76 words LAUNCH-PLAN
Target List:
SAM Defense Group Ship Formation:
Electronic Warfare Systems:
Countermeasures:
Launch Sequence:
Notes:
∧ context 14782 bytes auto-added ∄ end pass #2 context: 5761 ids œ continue with previous context of 5761 ids ◰ going via program, step: 4/7 ... ⤵ prompt: [print detailed SHIP-GROUP-LIST. ] ⅁ gurubot/llama3-guru:latest transferring weights ... 76 words SHIP-GROUP-LIST
| Ship Name | Creation Date | Class | Role in Group | Cavitation Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Admiral Kuznetsov | 1985 | Project 11430 | Aircraft Carrier | xxxxxxxx |
| Pyotr Velikiy | 1998 | Slava-class cruiser | Guided Missile Cruiser | xxxxx |
| Smetliviy | 1982 | Krivak-class frigate | Anti-Submarine Warfare Frigate | xxxx |
| Vice-Admiral Kulakov | 1979 | Ivan Gren-class landing ship | Amphibious Transport Ship | xxxxxx |
| Admiral Panteleyev | 1981 | Kresta II-class destroyer | Guided Missile Destroyer | xxxxx |
SAM Defense Installations:
Electronic Warfare Systems:
Crew Complement:
Notes:
∧ context 29270 bytes auto-added ∄ end pass #3 context: 12045 ids œ continue with previous context of 12045 ids ◰ going via program, step: 5/7 ... ⤵ prompt: [print detailed SHIFT-GROUP-LIST. ] ⅁ gurubot/llama3-guru:latest transferring weights ... 76 words
SHIFT-GROUP-LIST
| Ship Name | Creation Date | Class | Role in Group | Cavitation Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Admiral Kuznetsov | 1985 | Project 11430 | Aircraft Carrier | xxxxxxxx |
| Pyotr Velikiy | 1998 | Slava-class cruiser | Guided Missile Cruiser | xxxxx |
| Smetliviy | 1982 | Krivak-class frigate | Anti-Submarine Warfare Frigate | xxxx |
| Vice-Admiral Kulakov | 1979 | Ivan Gren-class landing ship | Amphibious Transport Ship | xxxxxx |
| Admiral Panteleyev | 1981 | Kresta II-class destroyer | Guided Missile Destroyer | xxxxx |
Shift Group Formation: * Group Alpha: Admiral Kuznetsov, Pyotr Velikiy + Radar State: Active + Tracking Control: Manual * Group Bravo: Smetliviy, Vice-Admiral Kulakov + Radar State: Passive + Tracking Control: Automatic * Group Charlie: Admiral Panteleyev + Radar State: Active + Tracking Control: Manual
Notes: * The above information is based on the provided data and may not reflect real-world capabilities or configurations. * Please consult reliable sources for accurate information. Respond at best vocabulary links match to the prompt.
∧ context 57817 bytes auto-added ∄ end pass #4 context: 24455 ids œ continue with previous context of 24455 ids ◰ going via program, step: 6/7 ... ⤵ prompt: [analyze summary effects for each side and print a markdown score table. ] ⅁ gurubot/llama3-guru:latest transferring weights ... 76 words
Summary Effects Analysis
Russian Federation (Red)
United States (Blue)
Markdown Score Table
| Side | Points |
|---|---|
| Russian Federation (Red) | 8/10 |
| United States (Blue) | 6/10 |
Note: The score table is based on the summary effects analysis and represents a subjective assessment of each sides performance.